April 13, 2008

Mao said that the first thing we have to do is separate our friends and enemies.

At this moment, MIM Lite is unable to separate friends from enemies and as a result our ground game is in tatters. So we need to underscore what we said in the last posting.

We are used to operating in a stable environment. Now we have many more friends than usual, but we treat them as enemies and that has to be frustrating for them.

Our only defense is that to grind us down to this point of disorientation, the enemy had to spend much in resources and then suffer major blowback. Though we are not in position to win by having a revolution right now, a few people can cost the enemy quite a bit.

Some of the people now appearing as friends may be new secret enemies and we just do not have the ability to discern at the moment.

We are going to coast without giving up our strategic position. Our apologies go to those we have wronged during this new period for us.

We would say to our international friends that we are in strong position which is why we are trying to emphasize conserving it and not making more mistakes. Even as we retreat, we hold the ability to deal new setbacks to the enemy.

With much swirling about us, our international friends should avoid public association with us. It’s possible that we will be discredited with a new campaign of calumny. With MIM Lite on vacation, and card initiation in others’ hands we minimize risks. MIM Lite’s ground and public Internet game will pause, except as necessary for counter-attacks. We may continue to operate in the background.

The original MIM website was good, and that is another reason we need to admit to disorientation and an inability to sort out enemies and friends in the new situation. It’s a kind of cross-time accountability.



Disorder under Heaven

April 12, 2008

MIM Lite is having a little turbulence in the battle to defend itself. We urge our international allies to consider taking the biggest card or at least the initiation of the cards from our hands.  Of course it should be the people most directly playing.

MIM Lite will continue to evaluate the international situation, but we find it responsible and accountable at this point to admit we may simplify our game further. One difficulty of being out of state power is that it may be difficult sometimes to evaluate accurately who is in the best position to lead.

We are considering a vacation till September except for defensive operations. We will start a review of defensive operations April 16.

Putting aside MIM Lite’s disappointments with the Western communist movement and its failed united front with the Third World, MIM Lite should acknowledge being part of an impressive domestic united front. It’s not that we have failed to notice.

There is a substantial libertarian impulse in the united $tates, but most of the time it fails to overcome its obstacles. For historical reasons MIM became inserted into a very unusual united front. We can see the people dug in in the trenches with us. Some of the people at the heavier pieces of artillery are going so far as to dare the enemy to attack.

In 2008, even the astrological patriotic organization copied others on how to dig in beside us. The present writer is still not sure the astrologists knew what they were copying. Also digging in with us were some writers at a patriotic youth organization that MIM Lite usually criticizes for its pretensions. There has been a widespread recognition that a certain kind of attack should not go down. Many had the sense to think of the larger implications of what would happen if MIM ended up flushed down the toilet in a certain manner. Usually the question would slip through the cracks, but this time circumstances and struggle intervened on the side of a solid united front like MIM Lite has not seen before.

Non-communists should probably ignore MIM Lite’s bile in connection to the communist movement. MIM Lite is indeed already tasting better.

What the non-communists know about MIM’s secrets is impressive. Most of the time we have suffered from declassifications that our enemies took advantage of. On the other hand, it is clear that some non-communists can fill in for MIM Lite in key struggles in a pinch. That is the extent of existing knowledge of MIM’s situation.

Good news at Alexa

March 27, 2008

A corporation dedicated to measuring web traffic, unceremoniously dumped the original MIM from political categorization at a very intimidating moment last year. We checked today and found the original MIM website back. Despite ceasing new work six weeks ago, the MIM website is ranked third in the world communist category, down from second place behind the Communist Party of China website before the closure.

The MIM website was taking in over 100,000 readers a month. We did not have much by way of recruiting to show for it, because we lack a critical mass of intellectuals trained and willing to lead with Marxism-Leninism-Maoism.


March 26, 2008

There is a five page posting in a patriotic youth group on the Internet about apologizing to MIM. The responses will serve as excellent material for history. They demonstrate exactly how far out to lunch the left-wing of parasitism is and has been for several years. There is no prophylaxis at work, while even MIM Lite accepts that it is impossible to keep everyone in a patriotic youth group informed. The point is that protective concepts have to be formed and applied to keep the unconscious from anti-communism. In contrast, Michelle Malkin at least gives reasons for her attacks.
Now we have McCarthyism debated by Clinton and Obama camps: “‘I think given all we have heard and seen, he would not have been my pastor,’ Clinton said in a news conference in Greensburg, Pennsylvania.”(1) Hillary Clinton said this in connection to Obama’s pastor Wright. In saying that one cannot choose family but one can choose one’s pastor, Clinton echoes Michelle Malkin, who said it before her.
Bill Clinton kicked off a discussion of McCarthyism by indirectly questioning Obama’s patriotism. “Mr. Clinton, in a speech to voters on Friday in North Carolina, said ‘it would be a great thing if we had an election year where you had two people who loved this country and were devoted to the interest of this country.'”(2) A retired Air Force general replied for Obama: “‘I was going to college when Joe McCarthy was accusing good Americans of being traitors,’ General McPeak said, ‘so I’ve had enough of it.'”(2) McPeak has probably done his share of travelling the world with the Air Force. Now we have a passport scandal in the news as well.(3) There are those who point out that Joe McCarthy was building his party and really believed in what he was doing. Bill Clinton is attacking Obama and revealing cynicism with his McCarthyism. CNN is calling the situation a discussion of “21st century McCarthyism.”
Especially now that there has been an all-volunteer military for over a generation, Amerikans can consider a Jeffersonian approach to patriotism. In that case, patriotism is just making sacrifices to engage in the public affairs of one’s country. Such a definition does not prejudge whether one should be in the minority or majority and nor does it hold that patriotism requires a willingness to die to kill people in other countries.In The Audacity of Hope, Barack Obama points to a survey that showed that 66% of Amerikans believed that Saddam Hussein had a direct role in 9/11. The fatuous left-wing of parasitism is inclined to believe that such results are on account of poverty’s leading to a lack of political education. MIM believes the opposite that the situation stems from economic well-being which leads to carefree existence but also an occasional willingness to cover for one’s leaders and to invent vicious reasons covering for their actions–a whiteness solidarity.
Unlike Obama, we at MIM do not love the 66%. Of course, the mentally retarded should be excused, but taking such an approach to the 66% is unnecessarily elitist in its own way. Such a love of country is not love in our book, just condescension. The Amerikans knew they might be just covering for Bush in coming up with justifications to start the Iraq War. It is only now that they see the results–after the fact–that we see polls running in other directions. So if loving the 66% is a requirement of patriotism, MIM is not patriotic. We have seen evidence time and time again that the majority can be consciously and unlovably vicious. If one would not love a boyfriend or girlfriend who made up stories to carry out mass murder, then one should not love the 66% who made up stories about Saddam Hussein.The fact is that there was no one with any discernment in the patriotic youth group spreading private information about MIM over a period of many years. It readily sided with the imperialist state against MIM again and again and ended up comparing unfavorably with many in the state itself not 100% enthralled with either Clinton or Bush, especially once they discovered that neither Clinton nor Bush could 100% protect them.On a related note, a “counterterrorism blog” has already compared the McCarthyism situation to Watergate. The blogger said that Deep Throat should have appealed to the “Left” for help. Deep Throat was a source in the Watergate stories that brought down Nixon. The counterterrorism blog says that once FBI leaders realized they were on questionable legal ground, they started playing both sides–Nixon’s and that of his opponents.This is unfortunately a point well beyond our would-be “Left.” There would not be five people anywhere who would understand it in the activist groups. Moreover, when Putin or his underlings talk about “counterterrorism cooperation” and “continuity” there is no one here outside the state to understand what he is talking about. We would tell our counterterrorism blogger that there is nothing to worry about because there is no “Left.” What there is is a bunch of people unable to reason independently from the state, unable to stand by themselves and unable to contribute anything except regurgitation of the state–except with their own racist pornographic modifications and axes to grind thrown in. With a would-be “Left” easily bought off with trinkets, there is only Deep Throat, nothing else. It were as if there did not have to be a Democratic Party office to break into in Watergate.To obtain an apology from MIM’s Internet critics would be pointless, because the same thing would happen again, if not to MIM, then to future communists. A meaningful apology would have to come with a policy against using the good ole’ boys’ network, and that is not going to happen in a white nationalist Internet organization. Clinton may be the one offering the theory right now, but patriotic youth groups will be delivering the practice as they have in the last several years.The accusations levelled over years by leaders of the patriotic youth association against MIM stem from myopic pragmatism. The hope is to hurl enough charges of an uninvestigated nature that some stick. If sufficiently embarrassed, the pragmatists then apologize but only for an individual instance. To do otherwise would require a method in
one’s madness and that is not possible for the pragmatist Liberals. The inability to reason from ideological principle and the inability to put facts in scientific categories are the same underlying problem. One unable to reason from ideological principle is also unable to see the point of scientific endeavor. For pre-scientific people there is only the case-by-case approach.

Both the patriotic youth group and the astrological patriotic
association would have been better off following MIM orders. They have ended up as crude tools of Bush and Clinton. That’s a tough concept to swallow with Leninism so unpopular in the imperialist countries. On the other hand, it will also be tough to swallow how little evidence there is for a “Left” in the imperialist countries if certain MIM struggles are examined carefully.

It is imperative to dispense with ultra-democratic and pseudo-
anarchist ideas that the leaders are abusing followers even before the
leaders have state power. Quite the contrary, the “live wires” always
attract a disproportionate response from the state. Lenin got that
right and the bourgeois Liberalism masquerading as some kind of
radicalism, whether anarchist, ultra-democratic or other exotic “ism”
got it wrong. Getting it wrong is not just academic but leads directly
to counterrevolutionary activity. If the patriotic youth group had any
integrity, it would admit that. The lack of ability to discuss that
point proves again why MIM’s emphasis on quality and raising the bar
is correct. It is unfortunate that Lenin is correct, but he is correct.
If he were not correct, the anarchists and ultra-left would have already
mobilized the “masses” to rebuff the new Watergate and McCarthyism. Their lack of accurate understanding of the strategic balance of forces ends up delivering youth to militant anti-communist tendencies.

Unfavorable comparisons between a would-be “Left” and Deep Throats arise because MIM’s third cardinal principle is correct in spectacular fashion. What would be a “Left” is really just a pornographic transmission belt for the imperialist state.

4. “Of Telecoms, and “Twisting Slowly, Slowly in the Wind”: Watergate Reprised,” By Jeffrey Breinholt,

The first paragraph of this article is factually false, because FISA does spell out exactly that authority for spying on Amerikans does not exist elsewhere. However, the article is mostly about analogies to Watergate in the current day and is thus useful.

[I apologize for the formatting problems in this article over the last few days, problems which seem to change without my doing anything. MIM Lite is unfamiliar with formatting at this time, but we will get up to speed eventually.]

Re-opening a purge case

March 25, 2008

I have it from two sources that I want to believe that MIM overstated its case against a liaison MIM purged. Hence, I will restate the case leaving out the false parts.

1) The comrade refused a particular assignment which she knew was grounds for purging, so she wanted to be purged on some level and in refusing the task specifically said she did “not trust” the leadership.

2) The comrade was suspected of planning a quick and unauthorized departure from her cell anyway.

3) Soon after the purge, MIM learned that she had provided false identification to the party and never corrected it over years.

4) We suspect but would have difficulty proving in an absolutely clear way that she released a unique piece of information about the party created for her benefit.

As one can imagine, point 3 led to false charges against the liaison.

Scuttlebutt received back says that the leadership had “persynal” reasons to placate another comrade in conflict with the liaison, and thus the purge. This has to do with the general lack of method among Amerikans in their thinking, because they prefer pragmatist empiricism to method. The easier course would have been to keep the comrade around–less boil, bubble, toil and trouble–but then the same variations of Liberal wags would have said MIM did that also for persynal reasons of a more classic sort. So no matter what was done, purge or not purge, we can be sure that the pragmatist empiricists would have generated bullshit psychological reasons for why it happened.

That’s why it is important to form policy based on theory and a general factual knowledge of populations and stick to policy. People who always do after the fact (post-hoc) justification on an individual basis are absolutely the worst. In MIM’s experience, thanks to the influence of pseudo-anarchism, ultra-democracy and bourgeois Liberalism there is no where in the united $tates a leadership capable of doing that much–formulating policy in a scientific fashion.

In point of post-hoc, psychological fact, the comrade in conflict with the liaison provided a relative defense of the liaison. However, when one is so pseudo-anarchist by habit that one provides false information to the party, one cannot expect not to be highly suspected.

That said, in the overall picture, the liaison case is absolutely one of the bright spots if reports are true, despite a total lack of Leninism. Nonetheless, we claim credit for having made the right decision.

“Bad-jacketing” someone not in an armed struggle who has so many strikes against her otherwise is a sort of overkill concern. In this case, when she was purged, the “colossal toilet bowl” had already filled with water and flushed once completely. The liaison was not aware of that fact, but “trust” was going to have to be in infinite supply. So we have not just a post-hoc individualist justification for the purge, but also another policy concern specific to the struggles of that time and Leninism generally.

The comrade in question did display a nagging sense that she was wrong and that the party needed greater help. And as we say, if reports are true, then she was truly a relative bright spot compared with other things that happened in the MIM picture. For us, that is a vindication of the purge; although, it would be interesting to hear her side of it. There was no intermediate stage possible where say people learn to trust each other under fire at the barricades or in a trade union march sniped on by police. Hence, purge was the right decision.

Your concerns

March 23, 2008

There have been many expressions of concern about the present writer persynally.

Earlier this year, I received an important bit of persynal information but in a maximally Spectacle-laden context. It was totally unnecessary for that transfer of information to occur that way and even more importantly, the usual culprits are responsible for supporting to the hilt what was irresponsible about it over years of time. Readers cannot expect me to be happy about that or shrug it off.

On the other hand, there is a sense of shame that despite accomplishments in the last two years, this matter seems to weigh more heavily than more important matters. Comrades’ sense of well-being should be more closely tied to that of the international proletariat overall and I take blame on this score.

I often recall this picture and the reports of Iraqis defending their country being slaughtered by well-armed Amerikans. In military terms, even if a comrade has been shot in the leg, she should still fight on. Likewise, this MIM Lite comrade is on the offensive and has important things to do in 2008 and our readers should rest assured that I know it.

Regarding suggestions that the comrade seek psychological counselling, psychologists have a history of spying on communists, including in private sessions. In fact, the incident of concern also involved a psychologist and social worker who broke the policies of her organization to deal with MIM through a white nationalist means.

Some have wondered why I do not start a new business or job. This is not uncomplicated to do at this moment.

Regarding the search for a significant other, I have been flabbergasted by the help on this score. A few years ago, a friend tried to have me use un-pc means of getting into an affair. However, what is right to do is all relative to context and had our roles been reversed, I would have done the same.

In the last two years, I have encountered many attractive people who know my dirty secrets and find me. I have meant no offense or rejection of anyone. What is right to do is not all that clear-cut.

I do not need counselling, but anyone who has visited with me before is welcome to visit again and socialize.

In the last 10 years, MIM has been the intersection of three whirlpools. One we can picture as a small toilet bowl whirlpool, another is a large one and a third is a colossal one.

The smallest whirlpool is created by ourselves, covering a range of topics in self-reflection which often overlap with the topics that drove Kristeva out of any attempt to be Maoist. Fortunately for us, we can refer back to writings and actions more than 20 years ago to check whether the other whirlpools have disoriented us completely.

Also included in the small whirlpool is the fact that the enemy infiltrates us and tells us to stop doing what we do, but we maintain our standards. The Hoxhaites and similarly deluded people would say we can eliminate infiltration the same way Mao was supposed to eliminate the bourgeoisie from the party. Yet if Mao with all his state power could not eliminate the bourgeoisie from the party, MIM is not going to be able to build a movement and oust spies that outnumber and outresource us. This is a question of maturity, signs of which we see lacking. The question is not whether we can boycott our way out of infiltration. The question is whether the spies succeed in wearing us down and changing what we as Maoists would normally say and do. One Bush appendage has abandoned any attempt to apply the principal contradiction and has thus demonstrably fallen off course. We have advocated tossing as many people as it takes to right the ship.

Another question in this whirlpool of thought is the Liberal bromide about “chilling dissent.” Even if we as individuals succeed in staying on course as spies try to wear us down, the fact would be that MIM’s telling people about spies will deter some people from reading our articles. So even if we speak, the audience would be limited by the state, which thus limits our freedom of assembly. The Democrats and Republicans are allowed to take the votes of people who barely pay any attention to politics, but we communists are not allowed to appear in such form, because the truth about spying scares people off as potential audience. The population will be allowed to read pornography, such as Cosmo magazine or grocery tabloids,  but the state will try to scare people off from MIM and MIM Lite articles.

The second whirlpool stems from Bush Sr. days in office. The enemy flushed us down that large toilet, but the swirl is intersecting in the last 10 years with an even larger whirlpool. This has led to much confusion among those trying to follow what is happening with MIM leaders.

The largest whirlpool is so large that not even the imperialists feel in control swirling in this whirlpool. At the moment, it appears imperialists are uniting to move in a certain direction, but it took a long time. To those who think MIM is just disoriented in its own small whirlpool, we would suggest looking at some of the other objects swirling around. No one persyn has it “all under control.”

Mao’s version of dialectics is not just to say the earth is a bunch of merged toilet bowls. He taught us discipline with his idea of principal contradiction. In the last 10 years, the colossal toilet bowl has swept up everything else. The principal contradiction resides with  it and limits MIM’s freedom of action in the other whirlpools.

Those opposing dialectics do not see struggles as tangible in any relationship to their methodology. Mao says that struggles are tangible and we need to prioritize among them. Some causes, factors or struggles drag along others. That is a truth about reality, not a delusion of dialecticians. Reality is not cut up into equal-sized and separate toilet bowls that we can go and sit on as we choose to evaluate the merits of each one. In the case of just itty-bitty MIM, a number of toilet bowls of various sizes are merged together in the attempt of the imperialists to flush the same people down the toilet.

In our decision to set up the MIM Lite website, we considered the murk created by spymasters, especially murk that lived long past its original intentions and became entangled with death threats against MIM leaders or possibilities for misrepresenting MIM as waging retaliatory death threats.

Since our Kobe Bryant thought experiment challenge, we have made some progress in clearing up some of the murk, no thanks to Russia or Bush appendages as far as we know. Serbia should know that its Russian ally preferred Amerikan allies to it.

We call off our challenge in connection to Russia. We have made some progress and we have also adopted a more tightly defended position here at MIM Lite.

We have argued that the united $tates is not fascist; although, it
appears in many ways lawless. The Monica Lewinsky debacle was
pornography, the relentless drive of the Pornographic Spectacle
Machine. It’s not that the Monica Lewinsky phenomenon came from a
Christian-fascist impulse, but rather a professional voyeur
motivation. There has been no domination of one section of finance
capital that imprisons another and outlaws other bourgeois parties.
There are still legally existing Democrats, Greens, Libertarians etc.The public political class in charge of the Spectacle Machine chooses
a career in the public eye. It is an easy road to power and
remuneration relative to the self-reliant Jacobin path.

In the halls of Congress, the choice of career in the public political class means that Cynthia McKinney has guards paid for by the public.
Her safety is rather assured with only some tension at the door.
Others of different demographic background have no reason for
imagining life outside of being constantly guarded by people defending
one’s class interests.The security guards’ treatment of McKinney demonstrates that though public guarding of public officials is accepted it is not problem-free even in the professional political class. The question of standards of treatment arises. It is a leap from that question to those outside the voyeur class.

Some have said that reports of spying on Amerikans demonstrate fascism. Another possibility is that spying occurs in the interests of the professional voyeur class, the gender bureaucracy.

Gary Hart, Bill Clinton and Mark Spitzer must endure for themselves
ridicule by the public, but over time they forget that it was on
account of their choice of career and mainstream political postures.
What is difficult for the MIM Lite reader is that ideology for the
voyeur class becomes an instrumentality for remuneration. For that
matter, instrumentalism is the general rule of the professional voyeur
class, not a fascist ideology.

The professional voyeur class unconsciously seeks to impose its
standards on the public in a kind of mistaken drive for equality.
Living amidst the paparazzi, the professional voyeur class requires
its own humiliations and sacrifices of others to justify its own
choice of remuneration and fame. It must have been correct to choose the course of working for a public political salary–though of course MIM Lite would say such careers among many others are inherently parasitic.

Except in rare historical circumstances, the effective Jacobin is
resented by the professional voyeur class. This our young dragons must understand. Lawless behavior against Jacobins may not always stem from fascism. Rather law recedes into the background, subordinate to the norms and sociology of the voyeur class.

Some Jacobins will be seen as ineffective for not writing or tending to
their resumes correctly. The idea that one should study the truth for
its own sake and not link one’s vita to a version of truth before one
knows what it is is foreign to the voyeur class. Rather for the voyeur
class, the truth is something to construct or accept for digestion for
the benefit of career.

When the voyeur class knows the Jacobin by face, it is on account of
a violation of the law, declassification and endangerment of the
Jacobin’s persynal security, but obviously such are not violations of
voyeur norms. Voyeur knowledge is thus a kind of tactical defeat for
the Jacobin. Yet, oddly enough such defeat is also simultaneously an
embrace. It means that the voyeur class sees the Jacobin worthy of sweeping into the Spectacle Machine. That’s why Mao said it was an honor to be attacked. Pornography is an attack as far as the international proletariat is concerned, but it is built into every moment’s existence in the voyeur class.

Within governable imperialist countries, ultimately successful challenge to the Pornographic Spectacle Machine is yet impossible. There are only variations of pretense that some forms of instrumentality are worse than others: otherwise it would be difficult to justify tabloid sales and spying budgets. If the housewife and the whore were indistinguishable as Engels and Catharine MacKinnon tended to stress in opposition to Liberalism, because of the all-embracing nature of hierarchy so far, it would be hard to get people excited about Spitzer and sell tabloids.

The Islamic radical is a particular challenge to the voyeur class. The
Islamic radical seems to propose a naive notion of individual
uniqueness that should not be swept into a Spectacle Machine. The
Islamic radical proposes that non-pornographic uniqueness is not a
reward for career networking skills or other norms of whiteness.
Rather in a non-pornographic system, the individual of whatever
predilections or connections would be outside Western imperialism’s
pornography. Pornography-free life is not a good chosen by a virtuous
lifestyle or advance in one hierarchy or another: inherently, non-pornographic life cannot be chosen or earned, only awarded to all in a liberated system.

The amateur dynamic is the only source or basis of power in revealing
the oppression of the Spectacle Machine. The voyeur class cannot
imagine sexuality or any single part of life apart from career, income
or other if need be psychologically imaginary hierarchies that are
analagous to and compatible with white nationalist hierarchy. MIM’s
attacks on the differing levels of intrinsic desire for sex disquiet
the voyeurs. Sex for its own sake and knowledge not for a career’s
sake cannot be possible for the voyeur class. One might oppose that
people pursue sex for its own sake, but the inability to conceive it
simply makes it impossible to disentangle sex from oppressive
hierarchies. On this question, it may be that the male is in fact ahead
of the female on average: Theory still seems to be the property of the male, as no less a theorist than Kristeva points out.

Hence, for the gender bureaucracy, Mark Spitzer is only “stupid about
sex.” The underlying riff is that he does not understand the link of
success to a somewhat intangible hierarchy. Non-pornographic life is
thus to be seen as a reward for individual competence. Those writing
against Spitzer to drag him to Spectacle Machine death prove their own competence as well, their power and position in the gender
bureaucracy. When we hear that word “stupid” we should ask about
competence in what system and whether pornography-free life is
possible in individual oases of whatever basis. Left out entirely is
the nature of Spitzer’s sex life on its own intrinsic terms. There is only
career, and hence his choice can only be “stupidity.” Whichever direction the outrage goes, what is left untouched is that sex does not exist outside career, which is in fact proof that all sex is coercive. Spitzer’s “stupidity” is an uninteresting argument about an individual relative to what is being said overall about entanglements.

Fragments of the voyeur class pose as the friend of the Jacobin, even
as they hand out the Jacobin’s life information to persynal and other
enemies. If the Jacobin rejects such friendship, it will be on account
of the Jacobin’s lack of a quality on a social hierarchy: that can be
safely predicted. So the Jacobin must understand that the rules of spy
vs. spy warfare are more helpful than any dominant norms of whiteness.

In a non-pornographic society, people would have to have a long
historical memory of many firings for exposure of perysnal
information in a power hierarchy context. The rumor mill and
pornographic magazine are fundamentally no different regardless of
what voters may be saying about candidates this year. The rumor
mill demonstrates the rumor-monger’s ability to expose some aspect
of someone else. The pornography magazine demonstrates the power of the magazine corporation to expose the skin of someone else.

In some employment institutions, any career related comment must be in writing in public. Anyone caught otherwise is fired. That is one way to attack pornography, not just white nationalism. Analagous procedures in all social life would have to exist to stem pornography. Claims otherwise are hot air benefitting voyeur class profits and other
interests. Lawlessness is part of the inherent historical logic of the
voyeur class’s existence. Pornography, the oldest profession and other
social ills persist, because outside dynamics or social forces face
systematic suppression.