An I$raeli paper reported on a March statement by Osama Bin Laden. Most reports left out too much material from the Osama Bin Laden statement.

The paper explained:

“Among what Al-Jazeera newscasters said were excerpts from a new recording, Bin-Laden said: ‘My speech is about the Gaza siege and the way to retrieve it and the rest of Palestine from the hands of the Zionist enemy. Our enemies did not take it by negotiations and dialog, but with fire and iron. And this is the way to get it back.’

“The Saudi-born Islamic fundamentalist linked the jihad against Israel with the Iraqi insurgency: ‘The nearest field of jihad today to support our people in Palestine is the Iraqi field.’

“Bin-Laden added that those of ‘our brothers in Palestine who could not join the jihad in the land of Al-Quds [Jerusalem]’ should ‘get rid of illusions of political parties and groups which are mired in trickery of the blasphemous democracy and to take their positions among the ranks of the mujahideen in Iraq.'”(1)

We do not want anyone to offer services to Al Qaeda in the united $tates, because it will turn out to be an undercover FBI agent. However, we should understand that Osama Bin Laden’s message is an example of internationalism.

The neo-Nazis including “National Bolsheviks” do not understand this message, because they are hung up over borders. In contrast, Osama Bin Laden says to show up in ungovernable Iraq to advance the cause of Palestinians.

There is a slowly growing recognition among Western communists that the more radical Muslims are in fact offering internationalism that makes the Western communist movement look bad.  Some of MIM’s fiercest critics are slowly tacking for a different line.

Osama Bin Laden has also tried to explain to us the local conditions. What we in the West do not know for instance is that there has been no Shiite government in an Arab country for 800 years.(2) Now there is one in Iraq thanks to the U.$. occupation. So, when we suddenly see a Shiite government, then we have to wonder if that is on account of lackey service to the united $tates or Great Satan as Iran rightly calls it. Such thoughts will cause many in Iraq distress.

The Iraqi Shiites themselves will not be happy being thought of as Great Satan’s lackeys. So there is civil war brewing. One analyst has said it will be “Lebanon on steroids.”(3)

As we wrote this article, the New York Times reported on U.$. airstrikes on a portion of Iraq’s Shiites.(4) This will prove to Shiites that some among them depend on Great Satan for support.

If Iraq goes into civil war to oust all U.$. lackeys, it will be on account of a lack of proletariat in the united $tates. Even though the Amerikan people are not thrilled with the Iraq War, they are not mobilized enough to prevent a civil war in Iraq. It comes down to the conscience of Amerikan politicians.

Senator McCain can go on pretending that U.$. troops will prevent the civil war, because there is no on-fire proletariat here to make him pay for that politically. Likewise, among our supposed Marxists there is rampant confusion which amounts to a sectarian attitude toward the Iraqi people. These Trotskyist and Trotsky-influenced organizations see nothing worth assisting with, because they see only the names of the mosques the Iraqi people attend, and they do not say, “4th International.”

Even if some leaders in Iraq would like to wait on the question of civil war till after U.$. elections, there is no guarantee that a hugely destructive civil war to oust U.$. influence will not occur in the meantime. The people of Iraq are not like Amerikans–well-fed, with good clothing and a roof over their heads and expecting their politicians to entertain them a la Mark Spitzer. The people of Iraq have much more serious questions on their mind, including the status of the Palestinians.

Notes:

1. http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/125643

2. http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/02/29/arts/IDLEDE1.php

3. http://edition.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/meast/03/27/basra.analysis/

4. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/29/world/middleeast/29iraq.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin

Christmas comes early: ‘Ho, ‘ho, ‘ho

MIM Lite has a sense of humor. There is something deliciously funny about “Spitzer girl”‘s immediate fame and fortune including the loss of some fortune when it turned out that she had already posed nude in a “Girls Gone Wild” video.(1) Brainwashed here, we get the humor the same way we pick up on countless drug jokes while not partaking in drugs. However, for MIM Lite, the humor is subtle, not overriding or an endpoint. For those thinking “bang someone famous, create a scandal and then cash in,” the question is whether one has enough sense not to think that sex really is business, even if “that’s the way it is” right now. A good reference point is going into denial on the Western ‘ho question while going out of the way to support liberation of Iranian or Afghan wimmin while sitting in the West. A Phyllis Chesler will pass on the ‘ho question while agitating on oppression of Islamic wimmin.

‘Ho


No Taliban ever gave a Heather Mills $48 million.

‘Ho


Hamas is not to blame for Jessica Hahn’s fortune.

‘Ho


Monica Lewinksy is not an Iranian TV host.(2)

It were as if people assumed that the prostitute Ashley Dupre’s (“Spitzer girl’s”) five minutes of fame have no impact on anything. There is no thought that with such as a daily occurrence in the United $tates, all social relations are affected. No one wonders if females can separate sex and business. That’s only for fuddy-duddy theoreticians at MIM Lite.

Amerikans are funny could be an OK conclusion by MIM Lite, but unfortunately, it does not stop there, because Amerikans had to go and be righteous about it. As of March 22 2008, there are 85 links at Google News for “International Women’s Day” and “Afghanistan.” In the first ten, four are from the U.$. Government, including two military publications. Another is Fox News. They found echo in other publications falsely claiming Marxism. White nationalist unity says that not only is “Spitzer girl” delicious fun, but also Amerikans should go impose that lifestyle on Afghanistan.

What ends up happening is simple Amerikkkan patriotism in the name of feminism. No one pointed out the ‘ho question on International Wimmin’s Day. That would hurt people’s feelings. Pussy-whipped, mother-whipped and cult-of-Mary-influenced men cannot dare to criticize even within alleged Marxist internationalism. It’s not surprising, because if Heather Mills is worth $8 million a year, we cannot expect Western men to come up with an ideology other than blind worship of their own porno-ized females.

Notes:
1. http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5hiYsf9j2n6Qg8Icr1LLWM-XNVwrgD8VGBLD00
2. http://www.usatoday.com/life/television/news/2003-04-20-monica_x.htm

On March 8, International Wimmin’s Day, we continue to see U.$. organizations serve as appendages of the State Department instead of advancing revolutionary feminism. Completely in line with the State Department and even military organizations, these running dogs focus on backwardness in Islamic countries.

Our idea is different. For us, imperialism is decadent, while for the neo-conservatives, Trotskyists and others who are so ultra-Trotskyist they cannot recognize their own ideology, imperialism is advanced as are its technologically advanced workers and wimmin.

So on International Wimmin’s Day, those of us who see imperialism as decadent talk about the decadence of U.$. adult females, the oppression of children and the oppression of Third World peoples sexually by U.$. females. 

For the State Department, neo-conservatives, Phyllis Chesler and ultra-Trotskyists, International Wimmin’s Day is a day to make U.$. adult females feel good by bashing Iran and Afghanistan. Seeing wimmin and workers of the united $tates as technologically and socially advanced leads to patriotism, Phyllis Chesler style.

In contrast, real Marxist-Leninist-Maoists apply Marxism against the theory of the productive forces–with attention to local conditions. We do not believe that U.$. females are so “advanced.” Rather they are economically comfortable and inclined to believe they deserve that comfort and that there must be something wrong with wimmin in Third World countries if they do not enjoy that comfort.

It all comes down to whether Lenin and Sultan-Galiev were correct that imperialism is decadent or whether they were old farts and sourpusses and imperialism actually continues to advance as Trotsky argued. Those who stress capital accumulation and the advance of the productive forces (technology included) are in Trotsky’s boat whether they know it or not.

True, Amerikan females have gained superior access to education and the economy and even surpass males in education now. Yet, we have argued that that is an economic factor related to how the united $tates has taken workers from other countries and bourgeoisified them here, mostly as petty-bourgeoisie. Economic wealth is not proof of wimmin’s liberation.

Most foreigners judging Amerikan females find them lacking in moral reasoning of any kind. The reason is that relatively speaking, Amerikan females are lacking in moral reasoning, because they come from a socially decadent country that happens to enjoy a great living standard based on parasitism.

The Trotskyists believe that Amerikans being so advanced they are exploited more as workers and contribute more than enough labor to form their living standard. On a corresponding basis, they hold that Amerikan female moral behaviors are liberated ones, not the sign of an imperialist system. Technologically advanced and liberated as wimmin, Amerikan females are justifiably proud of their international position according to Trotskyism, which has become an important disguise for patriotism.

We at MIM Lite want to see wimmin enjoy high education levels–as high as men’s–and enter the economy on an equal basis. However, we want to see that happen without exploiting the rest of the world. U.$. exploitation has gone so far along with U.$. sexual advantages, that Amerikan females are in fact gender oppressors when viewed in overall international perspective.

We have argued that the united $tates is not fascist; although, it
appears in many ways lawless. The Monica Lewinsky debacle was
pornography, the relentless drive of the Pornographic Spectacle
Machine. It’s not that the Monica Lewinsky phenomenon came from a
Christian-fascist impulse, but rather a professional voyeur
motivation. There has been no domination of one section of finance
capital that imprisons another and outlaws other bourgeois parties.
There are still legally existing Democrats, Greens, Libertarians etc.The public political class in charge of the Spectacle Machine chooses
a career in the public eye. It is an easy road to power and
remuneration relative to the self-reliant Jacobin path.

In the halls of Congress, the choice of career in the public political class means that Cynthia McKinney has guards paid for by the public.
Her safety is rather assured with only some tension at the door.
Others of different demographic background have no reason for
imagining life outside of being constantly guarded by people defending
one’s class interests.The security guards’ treatment of McKinney demonstrates that though public guarding of public officials is accepted it is not problem-free even in the professional political class. The question of standards of treatment arises. It is a leap from that question to those outside the voyeur class.

Some have said that reports of spying on Amerikans demonstrate fascism. Another possibility is that spying occurs in the interests of the professional voyeur class, the gender bureaucracy.

Gary Hart, Bill Clinton and Mark Spitzer must endure for themselves
ridicule by the public, but over time they forget that it was on
account of their choice of career and mainstream political postures.
What is difficult for the MIM Lite reader is that ideology for the
voyeur class becomes an instrumentality for remuneration. For that
matter, instrumentalism is the general rule of the professional voyeur
class, not a fascist ideology.

The professional voyeur class unconsciously seeks to impose its
standards on the public in a kind of mistaken drive for equality.
Living amidst the paparazzi, the professional voyeur class requires
its own humiliations and sacrifices of others to justify its own
choice of remuneration and fame. It must have been correct to choose the course of working for a public political salary–though of course MIM Lite would say such careers among many others are inherently parasitic.

Except in rare historical circumstances, the effective Jacobin is
resented by the professional voyeur class. This our young dragons must understand. Lawless behavior against Jacobins may not always stem from fascism. Rather law recedes into the background, subordinate to the norms and sociology of the voyeur class.

Some Jacobins will be seen as ineffective for not writing or tending to
their resumes correctly. The idea that one should study the truth for
its own sake and not link one’s vita to a version of truth before one
knows what it is is foreign to the voyeur class. Rather for the voyeur
class, the truth is something to construct or accept for digestion for
the benefit of career.

When the voyeur class knows the Jacobin by face, it is on account of
a violation of the law, declassification and endangerment of the
Jacobin’s persynal security, but obviously such are not violations of
voyeur norms. Voyeur knowledge is thus a kind of tactical defeat for
the Jacobin. Yet, oddly enough such defeat is also simultaneously an
embrace. It means that the voyeur class sees the Jacobin worthy of sweeping into the Spectacle Machine. That’s why Mao said it was an honor to be attacked. Pornography is an attack as far as the international proletariat is concerned, but it is built into every moment’s existence in the voyeur class.

Within governable imperialist countries, ultimately successful challenge to the Pornographic Spectacle Machine is yet impossible. There are only variations of pretense that some forms of instrumentality are worse than others: otherwise it would be difficult to justify tabloid sales and spying budgets. If the housewife and the whore were indistinguishable as Engels and Catharine MacKinnon tended to stress in opposition to Liberalism, because of the all-embracing nature of hierarchy so far, it would be hard to get people excited about Spitzer and sell tabloids.

The Islamic radical is a particular challenge to the voyeur class. The
Islamic radical seems to propose a naive notion of individual
uniqueness that should not be swept into a Spectacle Machine. The
Islamic radical proposes that non-pornographic uniqueness is not a
reward for career networking skills or other norms of whiteness.
Rather in a non-pornographic system, the individual of whatever
predilections or connections would be outside Western imperialism’s
pornography. Pornography-free life is not a good chosen by a virtuous
lifestyle or advance in one hierarchy or another: inherently, non-pornographic life cannot be chosen or earned, only awarded to all in a liberated system.

The amateur dynamic is the only source or basis of power in revealing
the oppression of the Spectacle Machine. The voyeur class cannot
imagine sexuality or any single part of life apart from career, income
or other if need be psychologically imaginary hierarchies that are
analagous to and compatible with white nationalist hierarchy. MIM’s
attacks on the differing levels of intrinsic desire for sex disquiet
the voyeurs. Sex for its own sake and knowledge not for a career’s
sake cannot be possible for the voyeur class. One might oppose that
people pursue sex for its own sake, but the inability to conceive it
simply makes it impossible to disentangle sex from oppressive
hierarchies. On this question, it may be that the male is in fact ahead
of the female on average: Theory still seems to be the property of the male, as no less a theorist than Kristeva points out.

Hence, for the gender bureaucracy, Mark Spitzer is only “stupid about
sex.” The underlying riff is that he does not understand the link of
success to a somewhat intangible hierarchy. Non-pornographic life is
thus to be seen as a reward for individual competence. Those writing
against Spitzer to drag him to Spectacle Machine death prove their own competence as well, their power and position in the gender
bureaucracy. When we hear that word “stupid” we should ask about
competence in what system and whether pornography-free life is
possible in individual oases of whatever basis. Left out entirely is
the nature of Spitzer’s sex life on its own intrinsic terms. There is only
career, and hence his choice can only be “stupidity.” Whichever direction the outrage goes, what is left untouched is that sex does not exist outside career, which is in fact proof that all sex is coercive. Spitzer’s “stupidity” is an uninteresting argument about an individual relative to what is being said overall about entanglements.

Fragments of the voyeur class pose as the friend of the Jacobin, even
as they hand out the Jacobin’s life information to persynal and other
enemies. If the Jacobin rejects such friendship, it will be on account
of the Jacobin’s lack of a quality on a social hierarchy: that can be
safely predicted. So the Jacobin must understand that the rules of spy
vs. spy warfare are more helpful than any dominant norms of whiteness.

In a non-pornographic society, people would have to have a long
historical memory of many firings for exposure of perysnal
information in a power hierarchy context. The rumor mill and
pornographic magazine are fundamentally no different regardless of
what voters may be saying about candidates this year. The rumor
mill demonstrates the rumor-monger’s ability to expose some aspect
of someone else. The pornography magazine demonstrates the power of the magazine corporation to expose the skin of someone else.

In some employment institutions, any career related comment must be in writing in public. Anyone caught otherwise is fired. That is one way to attack pornography, not just white nationalism. Analagous procedures in all social life would have to exist to stem pornography. Claims otherwise are hot air benefitting voyeur class profits and other
interests. Lawlessness is part of the inherent historical logic of the
voyeur class’s existence. Pornography, the oldest profession and other
social ills persist, because outside dynamics or social forces face
systematic suppression.

Over a million workers toting AK-47s in the air surrounded the U.S. Congress the night of March 13. The House of Representatives met in its fifth secret session in history in a tense atmosphere to discuss its response. The last secret session was 25 years ago.

An astrologist exhorting the crowd said, “things really started clicking when we removed the hammer and sickle from our newspaper logo.” Citizens sporting captured makeshift tanks from local police departments flanked and guarded celebrating revolutionaries on foot in the streets of DC.

“Once we blew past the locals with their more educated use of weapons against us, it was a relatively easy task to overpower the 50 million security guards of McJihad Inc. securing the Capitol,” added the astrologist, Jeb Bunker. “The 50 million guards from Pakistan reinforcing the Congress did not have a high cost of reproduction of their labor-power,” he added.

Although Jeb Bunker’s speeches drew the largest crowds in the uprising, not all were content. “We dropped the hammer and sickle for a different reason,” said one disgruntled Jeb Bunker follower  who now stresses the “mass line.” “Now we use the water cooler to replace the hammer and the coconut tree to replace the sickle, as our contribution to the application of Marxism-Leninism-Maoism in the United States,” he added. However, a careful examination of the rebel faction’s literature shows that the logo is a topless Paris Hilton leaning on a water cooler with a bubble quote, “I get tired after proving it all night!” Underneath is the slogan “abortion free and on demand!”

Priscilla Prissy addressed the condition of females further, “I get tired of the MIM people always talking about the low morals of our females. That’s why it was so key to focus the fire on the backward wimmin of Iran and Afghanistan this International Wimmin’s Day,” Prissy said. “Jeb Bush’s speeches make me feel so good about myself after cheating on my boyfriend, slipping a laxative in my romantic competitor’s coffee and accusing my quota of minorities of rape,” she added. “It’s not that we are decadent here. It’s that they are so backward in the Islamic countries and the MIM just doesn’t get it, because they’re old white men not in tune with what young Maoists of America think today.”

From Nepal, Communist Party (Maoist) leader Prachanda hailed the developments: “Clearly, the line of the world party has been proven correct, particularly International Wimmin’s Day preparations.” “It was the timely aid to the occupation of Afghanistan that drew the best troops away from Washington, DC and allowed the rebellion to proceed relatively unmolested,” he said. “With our provocative statements supporting them, we lured the enemy deep into our territory, and exploited Americans needing refreshment at the water cooler did the rest.”

Not everyone in the crowd was a new face. Bill Clinton was in the ranks of the revolutionaries: “Our health care plan covers everybody! Know the Clintons. Love the Clintons and you will get a job!” A rank-and-file member of the Prison Guards Union Charles Graner agreed, “the thing about the MIM line is that it is all talk, nothing concrete for us.” Graner passed out business cards to cheerful passers-by.

Rumors surfaced that Barack Obama was also on the scene, but MIM Lite reporters were unable to confirm the veracity of those reports. Nonetheless, marching demonstrators chanted “change comes from below.”

A stand-off between Black supporters of Obama and other factions ended peacefully. “The profits of the telecoms are obscene,” said Bubba Bunker. “We and the Obama supporters realized we have to unite against the MIM line, on behalf of the real masses and against McJihad Inc.,” he said.

Supporters of the Obama faction and others attended an impromptu Bruce Springsteen concert on the street. “By rallying our base in the American flag-waving Bruce Springsteen fans, we were able to defeat the 50 million McJihad Inc.  guards reinforcing Congress’s security perimeter. However, now we must have vigilance against further reinforcements from Palestine, Syria, Iran and Indonesia to finally defeat the greedy condom companies raising the cost of living!” said Jeb Bunker.

Notes:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,337709,00.html

http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9894165-7.html

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/03/13/bush.fisa/?iref=mpstoryview

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/13/AR2008031304435.html?hpid=news-col-blog

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/03/13/politics/politico/thecrypt/main3937515.shtml

http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssTechMediaTelecomNews/idUSN1329020320080314

On International Wimmin’s Day 2008, the Bush appendage prepared the grounds for Iran and Afghanistan.

Bush acted.

Bush acted.

The “Communist Party of Nepal(Maoist)” has not condemned this. It should tell the masses of the subcontinent of its plans to control Islamic people with U.$. troops and stop hiding.